Navigating the Geopolitical Risks of Solar Geoengineering
Two experts discuss the geopolitical risks of solar geoengineering and the need for global governance frameworks to prevent conflict.
Solar geoengineering, the deliberate modification of Earth’s atmosphere to curb global warming, still seems like science fiction. However, research is progressing rapidly, and geoengineering’s potential implementation has drawn the attention of the United States Congress, which has mandated a research plan to explore its human and societal impacts.
On the podcast, two experts explore one of the least understood but potentially weighty societal issues surrounding solar geoengineering, namely the potential for the technology to be the source of geopolitical tension and even war.
Scott Moore, a Practice Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania, and Craig Martin, a specialist in public international law at Washburn University, discuss their forthcoming research that considers the uneven distribution of benefits and risks that would result from geoengineering and how this might lead to conflict between countries. They also explore governance frameworks to help manage geopolitical tensions if and when solar geoengineering is implemented.
Scott Moore
Director of China Programs and Strategic InitiativesScott Moore is a former senior fellow at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and the Director of China Programs and Strategic Initiatives. He is also a practice professor of political science.
Craig Martin
Professor of Law, Washburn UniversityCraig Martin is a professor of law at Washburn University who specializes in public international law, in particular law pertaining to armed conflict and climate change.
Andy Stone
Energy Policy Now Host and ProducerAndy Stone is producer and host of Energy Policy Now, the Kleinman Center’s podcast series. He previously worked in business planning with PJM Interconnection and was a senior energy reporter at Forbes Magazine.