Teeming with Carbon Taxes

Array
(
    [links] => Array
        (
            [#theme] => links__node
            [#pre_render] => Array
                (
                    [0] => drupal_pre_render_links
                )

            [#attributes] => Array
                (
                    [class] => Array
                        (
                            [0] => links
                            [1] => inline
                        )

                )

            [node] => Array
                (
                    [#theme] => links__node__node
                    [#links] => Array
                        (
                        )

                    [#attributes] => Array
                        (
                            [class] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => links
                                    [1] => inline
                                )

                        )

                )

        )

    [field_authors] => Array
        (
            [#theme] => field
            [#weight] => 0
            [#title] => Author(s)
            [#access] => 1
            [#label_display] => hidden
            [#view_mode] => full
            [#language] => und
            [#field_name] => field_authors
            [#field_type] => entityreference
            [#field_translatable] => 0
            [#entity_type] => node
            [#bundle] => wp_blog
            [#object] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [vid] => 13080
                    [uid] => 118
                    [title] => Teeming with Carbon Taxes 
                    [log] => 
                    [status] => 1
                    [comment] => 0
                    [promote] => 0
                    [sticky] => 0
                    [nid] => 9981
                    [type] => wp_blog
                    [language] => und
                    [created] => 1565634121
                    [changed] => 1573503438
                    [tnid] => 0
                    [translate] => 0
                    [revision_timestamp] => 1573503438
                    [revision_uid] => 118
                    [body] => Array
                        (
                            [und] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => Array
                                        (
                                            [value] => 

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. Here is a summary of what has been proposed thus far:

Before we dig into the similarities and differences between these plans, what is a carbon tax? Simply put, a carbon tax is a price put on each unit of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. This price creates an incentive for emitters to lower emissions.

Embedded video: https://youtu.be/45wuGMgG1tE                 

All of the proposed bills put a price on carbon across the energy system. Where they differ is primarily in the price path and revenue use. Resources for the Future created a thorough table that explains the details of each proposed bill and compares the bills to one another.
 

Difference in Carbon Price Rates over Time, Resources for the Future

As you can see in the figure from Resources for the Future, some proposals are more ambitious, like Senator Coons bill that raises the price per ton of carbon dioxide to over $200 by 2035. Not surprisingly, Republican Congressman Rooney has the most moderate plan of the bunch.

And the members have different ideas about how the generated funds should be spent. Representative Deutch’s Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act proposes using all the funds for taxable carbon dividends. The other bills include a variety of revenue uses including payroll tax cuts, social security beneficiary payments, energy efficiency research and development, infrastructure spending, and more.

While there are a lot of ideas floating through the halls of Congress, does any one of them have a chance of becoming law? The short answer is no. Congress has been notoriously deadlocked and divided, with a Republican controlled Senate and a Democratic controlled House. When Congress returns from August recess, there will only have a few weeks before we begin to move into an election year. And in an election year, a controversial bill tackling climate change is highly unlikely to see a vote.

Recent research from the Kleinman Center shows that a carbon tax vote is largely ideological. “While the carbon tax has the favor of economists and policy elites, American voters are not yet ready to jump on the bandwagon. Carbon taxes remain a highly ideological and polarizing issue,” writes the authors. Politicians are not expected to fight for an issue that doesn’t have the backing of their constituents.

While it is doubtful that any of the six proposed bills will become law in this Congress, it is exciting that these issues are being discussed and debated. And encouraging that perhaps sometime in the near future the needle will move even closer to a carbon tax becoming a reality.

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. Here is a summary of what has been proposed thus far:

Before we dig into the similarities and differences between these plans, what is a carbon tax? Simply put, a carbon tax is a price put on each unit of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. This price creates an incentive for emitters to lower emissions.

Embedded video: https://youtu.be/45wuGMgG1tE                 

All of the proposed bills put a price on carbon across the energy system. Where they differ is primarily in the price path and revenue use. Resources for the Future created a thorough table that explains the details of each proposed bill and compares the bills to one another.
 

Difference in Carbon Price Rates over Time, Resources for the Future

As you can see in the figure from Resources for the Future, some proposals are more ambitious, like Senator Coons bill that raises the price per ton of carbon dioxide to over $200 by 2035. Not surprisingly, Republican Congressman Rooney has the most moderate plan of the bunch.

And the members have different ideas about how the generated funds should be spent. Representative Deutch’s Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act proposes using all the funds for taxable carbon dividends. The other bills include a variety of revenue uses including payroll tax cuts, social security beneficiary payments, energy efficiency research and development, infrastructure spending, and more.

While there are a lot of ideas floating through the halls of Congress, does any one of them have a chance of becoming law? The short answer is no. Congress has been notoriously deadlocked and divided, with a Republican controlled Senate and a Democratic controlled House. When Congress returns from August recess, there will only have a few weeks before we begin to move into an election year. And in an election year, a controversial bill tackling climate change is highly unlikely to see a vote.

Recent research from the Kleinman Center shows that a carbon tax vote is largely ideological. “While the carbon tax has the favor of economists and policy elites, American voters are not yet ready to jump on the bandwagon. Carbon taxes remain a highly ideological and polarizing issue,” writes the authors. Politicians are not expected to fight for an issue that doesn’t have the backing of their constituents.

While it is doubtful that any of the six proposed bills will become law in this Congress, it is exciting that these issues are being discussed and debated. And encouraging that perhaps sometime in the near future the needle will move even closer to a carbon tax becoming a reality.

[safe_summary] => ) ) ) [taxonomy_wp_blog_tags] => Array ( ) [field_intro_image] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 3456 [uid] => 118 [filename] => iStock-1059774710.jpg [uri] => public://iStock-1059774710.jpg [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 2450737 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1565634121 [focus_rect] => 0,283,2389,928 [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => The flag outside the U.S. Capitol [title] => [width] => 2400 [height] => 1602 ) ) ) [field_blog_author] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Mollie Simon [format] => [safe_value] => Mollie Simon ) ) ) [field_image_caption] => Array ( ) [field_set_as_featured_] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => no ) ) ) [field_authors] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [target_id] => 2377 [entity] => stdClass Object ( [vid] => 2814 [uid] => 10 [title] => Mollie Simon [log] => [status] => 1 [comment] => 1 [promote] => 0 [sticky] => 0 [nid] => 2377 [type] => people_bio [language] => und [created] => 1471467818 [changed] => 1558449480 [tnid] => 0 [translate] => 0 [revision_timestamp] => 1558449480 [revision_uid] => 118 [body] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

Mollie Simon manages the center's social media accounts, drafts newsletters and announcements, writes and publishes content for our website, and regularly posts to our blog. Prior to joining the Kleinman Center, she worked in environmental advocacy at both national and local non-profit organizations. She served as a climate and energy fellow at the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C. and the outreach coordinator at Clean Air Council in Philadelphia. Her policy work has primarily focused on Clean Power Plan implementation and regulation of methane emissions from the natural gas sector. 

Simon holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania, with a concentration in policy.

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

Mollie Simon manages the center's social media accounts, drafts newsletters and announcements, writes and publishes content for our website, and regularly posts to our blog. Prior to joining the Kleinman Center, she worked in environmental advocacy at both national and local non-profit organizations. She served as a climate and energy fellow at the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C. and the outreach coordinator at Clean Air Council in Philadelphia. Her policy work has primarily focused on Clean Power Plan implementation and regulation of methane emissions from the natural gas sector. 

Simon holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania, with a concentration in policy.

[safe_summary] => ) ) ) [field_headshot] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 2535 [uid] => 90 [filename] => UPENN-0356.jpg [uri] => public://UPENN-0356.jpg [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 10996445 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1520859348 [focus_rect] => 0,1159,3648,3648 [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => [title] => [width] => 3648 [height] => 5472 ) ) ) [field_org_title] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Communications Coordinator [format] => [safe_value] => Communications Coordinator ) ) ) [field_email] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [email] => smollie@upenn.edu ) ) ) [field_phone_number] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 215-573-3286 [format] => [safe_value] => 215-573-3286 ) ) ) [field_people_designation] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => staff ) ) ) [field_adboard_organization] => Array ( ) [field_project_years] => Array ( ) [field_bio_type] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [tid] => 185 ) ) ) [field_omit] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0 ) ) ) [field_biodepartment] => Array ( ) [field_teaser] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

is the communications coordinator at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania.

[format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

is the communications coordinator at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania.

) ) ) [field_label_above_name] => Array ( ) [field_year] => Array ( ) [metatags] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [article:published_time] => Array ( [value] => ) [article:modified_time] => Array ( [value] => ) ) ) [rdf_mapping] => Array ( [rdftype] => Array ( [0] => sioc:Item [1] => foaf:Document ) [title] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:title ) ) [created] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:date [1] => dc:created ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [changed] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:modified ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [body] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => content:encoded ) ) [uid] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:has_creator ) [type] => rel ) [name] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => foaf:name ) ) [comment_count] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:num_replies ) [datatype] => xsd:integer ) [last_activity] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:last_activity_date ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) ) [path] => Array ( [pathauto] => 1 ) [name] => bill [picture] => 0 [data] => b:0; ) [access] => 1 ) ) ) [field_addthis] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Dummy value ) ) ) [field_teaser] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. How do these bills compare and will any of them become law?

[format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. How do these bills compare and will any of them become law?

) ) ) [field_primary_theme] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [tid] => 204 ) ) ) [field_secondary_themes] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [tid] => 195 ) ) ) [field_exclude] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0 ) ) ) [field_more_like_this] => Array ( ) [field_show_cropped_image] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1 ) ) ) [field_voices] => Array ( ) [rdf_mapping] => Array ( [rdftype] => Array ( [0] => sioc:Item [1] => foaf:Document ) [title] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:title ) ) [created] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:date [1] => dc:created ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [changed] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:modified ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [body] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => content:encoded ) ) [uid] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:has_creator ) [type] => rel ) [name] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => foaf:name ) ) [comment_count] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:num_replies ) [datatype] => xsd:integer ) [last_activity] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:last_activity_date ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) ) [path] => Array ( [pathauto] => 1 ) [name] => mollie [picture] => 0 [data] => b:0; [entity_view_prepared] => 1 ) [#items] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [target_id] => 2377 [entity] => stdClass Object ( [vid] => 2814 [uid] => 10 [title] => Mollie Simon [log] => [status] => 1 [comment] => 1 [promote] => 0 [sticky] => 0 [nid] => 2377 [type] => people_bio [language] => und [created] => 1471467818 [changed] => 1558449480 [tnid] => 0 [translate] => 0 [revision_timestamp] => 1558449480 [revision_uid] => 118 [body] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

Mollie Simon manages the center's social media accounts, drafts newsletters and announcements, writes and publishes content for our website, and regularly posts to our blog. Prior to joining the Kleinman Center, she worked in environmental advocacy at both national and local non-profit organizations. She served as a climate and energy fellow at the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C. and the outreach coordinator at Clean Air Council in Philadelphia. Her policy work has primarily focused on Clean Power Plan implementation and regulation of methane emissions from the natural gas sector. 

Simon holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania, with a concentration in policy.

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

Mollie Simon manages the center's social media accounts, drafts newsletters and announcements, writes and publishes content for our website, and regularly posts to our blog. Prior to joining the Kleinman Center, she worked in environmental advocacy at both national and local non-profit organizations. She served as a climate and energy fellow at the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C. and the outreach coordinator at Clean Air Council in Philadelphia. Her policy work has primarily focused on Clean Power Plan implementation and regulation of methane emissions from the natural gas sector. 

Simon holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania, with a concentration in policy.

[safe_summary] => ) ) ) [field_headshot] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 2535 [uid] => 90 [filename] => UPENN-0356.jpg [uri] => public://UPENN-0356.jpg [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 10996445 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1520859348 [focus_rect] => 0,1159,3648,3648 [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => [title] => [width] => 3648 [height] => 5472 ) ) ) [field_org_title] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Communications Coordinator [format] => [safe_value] => Communications Coordinator ) ) ) [field_email] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [email] => smollie@upenn.edu ) ) ) [field_phone_number] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 215-573-3286 [format] => [safe_value] => 215-573-3286 ) ) ) [field_people_designation] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => staff ) ) ) [field_adboard_organization] => Array ( ) [field_project_years] => Array ( ) [field_bio_type] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [tid] => 185 ) ) ) [field_omit] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0 ) ) ) [field_biodepartment] => Array ( ) [field_teaser] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

is the communications coordinator at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania.

[format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

is the communications coordinator at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania.

) ) ) [field_label_above_name] => Array ( ) [field_year] => Array ( ) [metatags] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [article:published_time] => Array ( [value] => ) [article:modified_time] => Array ( [value] => ) ) ) [rdf_mapping] => Array ( [rdftype] => Array ( [0] => sioc:Item [1] => foaf:Document ) [title] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:title ) ) [created] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:date [1] => dc:created ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [changed] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:modified ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [body] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => content:encoded ) ) [uid] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:has_creator ) [type] => rel ) [name] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => foaf:name ) ) [comment_count] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:num_replies ) [datatype] => xsd:integer ) [last_activity] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:last_activity_date ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) ) [path] => Array ( [pathauto] => 1 ) [name] => bill [picture] => 0 [data] => b:0; ) [access] => 1 ) ) [#formatter] => entityreference_label [0] => Array ( [#theme] => entityreference_label [#label] => Mollie Simon [#item] => Array ( [target_id] => 2377 [entity] => stdClass Object ( [vid] => 2814 [uid] => 10 [title] => Mollie Simon [log] => [status] => 1 [comment] => 1 [promote] => 0 [sticky] => 0 [nid] => 2377 [type] => people_bio [language] => und [created] => 1471467818 [changed] => 1558449480 [tnid] => 0 [translate] => 0 [revision_timestamp] => 1558449480 [revision_uid] => 118 [body] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

Mollie Simon manages the center's social media accounts, drafts newsletters and announcements, writes and publishes content for our website, and regularly posts to our blog. Prior to joining the Kleinman Center, she worked in environmental advocacy at both national and local non-profit organizations. She served as a climate and energy fellow at the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C. and the outreach coordinator at Clean Air Council in Philadelphia. Her policy work has primarily focused on Clean Power Plan implementation and regulation of methane emissions from the natural gas sector. 

Simon holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania, with a concentration in policy.

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

Mollie Simon manages the center's social media accounts, drafts newsletters and announcements, writes and publishes content for our website, and regularly posts to our blog. Prior to joining the Kleinman Center, she worked in environmental advocacy at both national and local non-profit organizations. She served as a climate and energy fellow at the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C. and the outreach coordinator at Clean Air Council in Philadelphia. Her policy work has primarily focused on Clean Power Plan implementation and regulation of methane emissions from the natural gas sector. 

Simon holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania, with a concentration in policy.

[safe_summary] => ) ) ) [field_headshot] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 2535 [uid] => 90 [filename] => UPENN-0356.jpg [uri] => public://UPENN-0356.jpg [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 10996445 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1520859348 [focus_rect] => 0,1159,3648,3648 [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => [title] => [width] => 3648 [height] => 5472 ) ) ) [field_org_title] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Communications Coordinator [format] => [safe_value] => Communications Coordinator ) ) ) [field_email] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [email] => smollie@upenn.edu ) ) ) [field_phone_number] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 215-573-3286 [format] => [safe_value] => 215-573-3286 ) ) ) [field_people_designation] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => staff ) ) ) [field_adboard_organization] => Array ( ) [field_project_years] => Array ( ) [field_bio_type] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [tid] => 185 ) ) ) [field_omit] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0 ) ) ) [field_biodepartment] => Array ( ) [field_teaser] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

is the communications coordinator at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania.

[format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

is the communications coordinator at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania.

) ) ) [field_label_above_name] => Array ( ) [field_year] => Array ( ) [metatags] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [article:published_time] => Array ( [value] => ) [article:modified_time] => Array ( [value] => ) ) ) [rdf_mapping] => Array ( [rdftype] => Array ( [0] => sioc:Item [1] => foaf:Document ) [title] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:title ) ) [created] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:date [1] => dc:created ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [changed] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:modified ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [body] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => content:encoded ) ) [uid] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:has_creator ) [type] => rel ) [name] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => foaf:name ) ) [comment_count] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:num_replies ) [datatype] => xsd:integer ) [last_activity] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:last_activity_date ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) ) [path] => Array ( [pathauto] => 1 ) [name] => bill [picture] => 0 [data] => b:0; ) [access] => 1 ) [#uri] => Array ( [path] => node/2377 [options] => Array ( [entity_type] => node [entity] => stdClass Object ( [vid] => 2814 [uid] => 10 [title] => Mollie Simon [log] => [status] => 1 [comment] => 1 [promote] => 0 [sticky] => 0 [nid] => 2377 [type] => people_bio [language] => und [created] => 1471467818 [changed] => 1558449480 [tnid] => 0 [translate] => 0 [revision_timestamp] => 1558449480 [revision_uid] => 118 [body] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

Mollie Simon manages the center's social media accounts, drafts newsletters and announcements, writes and publishes content for our website, and regularly posts to our blog. Prior to joining the Kleinman Center, she worked in environmental advocacy at both national and local non-profit organizations. She served as a climate and energy fellow at the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C. and the outreach coordinator at Clean Air Council in Philadelphia. Her policy work has primarily focused on Clean Power Plan implementation and regulation of methane emissions from the natural gas sector. 

Simon holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania, with a concentration in policy.

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

Mollie Simon manages the center's social media accounts, drafts newsletters and announcements, writes and publishes content for our website, and regularly posts to our blog. Prior to joining the Kleinman Center, she worked in environmental advocacy at both national and local non-profit organizations. She served as a climate and energy fellow at the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C. and the outreach coordinator at Clean Air Council in Philadelphia. Her policy work has primarily focused on Clean Power Plan implementation and regulation of methane emissions from the natural gas sector. 

Simon holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania, with a concentration in policy.

[safe_summary] => ) ) ) [field_headshot] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 2535 [uid] => 90 [filename] => UPENN-0356.jpg [uri] => public://UPENN-0356.jpg [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 10996445 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1520859348 [focus_rect] => 0,1159,3648,3648 [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => [title] => [width] => 3648 [height] => 5472 ) ) ) [field_org_title] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Communications Coordinator [format] => [safe_value] => Communications Coordinator ) ) ) [field_email] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [email] => smollie@upenn.edu ) ) ) [field_phone_number] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 215-573-3286 [format] => [safe_value] => 215-573-3286 ) ) ) [field_people_designation] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => staff ) ) ) [field_adboard_organization] => Array ( ) [field_project_years] => Array ( ) [field_bio_type] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [tid] => 185 ) ) ) [field_omit] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0 ) ) ) [field_biodepartment] => Array ( ) [field_teaser] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

is the communications coordinator at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania.

[format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

is the communications coordinator at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania.

) ) ) [field_label_above_name] => Array ( ) [field_year] => Array ( ) [metatags] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [article:published_time] => Array ( [value] => ) [article:modified_time] => Array ( [value] => ) ) ) [rdf_mapping] => Array ( [rdftype] => Array ( [0] => sioc:Item [1] => foaf:Document ) [title] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:title ) ) [created] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:date [1] => dc:created ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [changed] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:modified ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [body] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => content:encoded ) ) [uid] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:has_creator ) [type] => rel ) [name] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => foaf:name ) ) [comment_count] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:num_replies ) [datatype] => xsd:integer ) [last_activity] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:last_activity_date ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) ) [path] => Array ( [pathauto] => 1 ) [name] => bill [picture] => 0 [data] => b:0; ) ) ) [#settings] => Array ( [display] => Array ( [bypass_access] => 0 [link] => 1 ) [field] => Array ( [target_type] => node [handler] => base [handler_settings] => Array ( [target_bundles] => Array ( [people_bio] => people_bio [people_no_bio] => people_no_bio ) [sort] => Array ( [type] => none ) [behaviors] => Array ( [views-select-list] => Array ( [status] => 0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) [field_intro_image] => Array ( [#theme] => field [#weight] => 1 [#title] => Intro Image [#access] => 1 [#label_display] => hidden [#view_mode] => full [#language] => und [#field_name] => field_intro_image [#field_type] => image [#field_translatable] => 0 [#entity_type] => node [#bundle] => wp_blog [#object] => stdClass Object ( [vid] => 13080 [uid] => 118 [title] => Teeming with Carbon Taxes [log] => [status] => 1 [comment] => 0 [promote] => 0 [sticky] => 0 [nid] => 9981 [type] => wp_blog [language] => und [created] => 1565634121 [changed] => 1573503438 [tnid] => 0 [translate] => 0 [revision_timestamp] => 1573503438 [revision_uid] => 118 [body] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. Here is a summary of what has been proposed thus far:

Before we dig into the similarities and differences between these plans, what is a carbon tax? Simply put, a carbon tax is a price put on each unit of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. This price creates an incentive for emitters to lower emissions.

Embedded video: https://youtu.be/45wuGMgG1tE                 

All of the proposed bills put a price on carbon across the energy system. Where they differ is primarily in the price path and revenue use. Resources for the Future created a thorough table that explains the details of each proposed bill and compares the bills to one another.
 

Difference in Carbon Price Rates over Time, Resources for the Future

As you can see in the figure from Resources for the Future, some proposals are more ambitious, like Senator Coons bill that raises the price per ton of carbon dioxide to over $200 by 2035. Not surprisingly, Republican Congressman Rooney has the most moderate plan of the bunch.

And the members have different ideas about how the generated funds should be spent. Representative Deutch’s Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act proposes using all the funds for taxable carbon dividends. The other bills include a variety of revenue uses including payroll tax cuts, social security beneficiary payments, energy efficiency research and development, infrastructure spending, and more.

While there are a lot of ideas floating through the halls of Congress, does any one of them have a chance of becoming law? The short answer is no. Congress has been notoriously deadlocked and divided, with a Republican controlled Senate and a Democratic controlled House. When Congress returns from August recess, there will only have a few weeks before we begin to move into an election year. And in an election year, a controversial bill tackling climate change is highly unlikely to see a vote.

Recent research from the Kleinman Center shows that a carbon tax vote is largely ideological. “While the carbon tax has the favor of economists and policy elites, American voters are not yet ready to jump on the bandwagon. Carbon taxes remain a highly ideological and polarizing issue,” writes the authors. Politicians are not expected to fight for an issue that doesn’t have the backing of their constituents.

While it is doubtful that any of the six proposed bills will become law in this Congress, it is exciting that these issues are being discussed and debated. And encouraging that perhaps sometime in the near future the needle will move even closer to a carbon tax becoming a reality.

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. Here is a summary of what has been proposed thus far:

Before we dig into the similarities and differences between these plans, what is a carbon tax? Simply put, a carbon tax is a price put on each unit of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. This price creates an incentive for emitters to lower emissions.

Embedded video: https://youtu.be/45wuGMgG1tE                 

All of the proposed bills put a price on carbon across the energy system. Where they differ is primarily in the price path and revenue use. Resources for the Future created a thorough table that explains the details of each proposed bill and compares the bills to one another.
 

Difference in Carbon Price Rates over Time, Resources for the Future

As you can see in the figure from Resources for the Future, some proposals are more ambitious, like Senator Coons bill that raises the price per ton of carbon dioxide to over $200 by 2035. Not surprisingly, Republican Congressman Rooney has the most moderate plan of the bunch.

And the members have different ideas about how the generated funds should be spent. Representative Deutch’s Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act proposes using all the funds for taxable carbon dividends. The other bills include a variety of revenue uses including payroll tax cuts, social security beneficiary payments, energy efficiency research and development, infrastructure spending, and more.

While there are a lot of ideas floating through the halls of Congress, does any one of them have a chance of becoming law? The short answer is no. Congress has been notoriously deadlocked and divided, with a Republican controlled Senate and a Democratic controlled House. When Congress returns from August recess, there will only have a few weeks before we begin to move into an election year. And in an election year, a controversial bill tackling climate change is highly unlikely to see a vote.

Recent research from the Kleinman Center shows that a carbon tax vote is largely ideological. “While the carbon tax has the favor of economists and policy elites, American voters are not yet ready to jump on the bandwagon. Carbon taxes remain a highly ideological and polarizing issue,” writes the authors. Politicians are not expected to fight for an issue that doesn’t have the backing of their constituents.

While it is doubtful that any of the six proposed bills will become law in this Congress, it is exciting that these issues are being discussed and debated. And encouraging that perhaps sometime in the near future the needle will move even closer to a carbon tax becoming a reality.

[safe_summary] => ) ) ) [taxonomy_wp_blog_tags] => Array ( ) [field_intro_image] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 3456 [uid] => 118 [filename] => iStock-1059774710.jpg [uri] => public://iStock-1059774710.jpg [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 2450737 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1565634121 [focus_rect] => 0,283,2389,928 [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => The flag outside the U.S. Capitol [title] => [width] => 2400 [height] => 1602 ) ) ) [field_blog_author] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Mollie Simon [format] => [safe_value] => Mollie Simon ) ) ) [field_image_caption] => Array ( ) [field_set_as_featured_] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => no ) ) ) [field_authors] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [target_id] => 2377 [entity] => stdClass Object ( [vid] => 2814 [uid] => 10 [title] => Mollie Simon [log] => [status] => 1 [comment] => 1 [promote] => 0 [sticky] => 0 [nid] => 2377 [type] => people_bio [language] => und [created] => 1471467818 [changed] => 1558449480 [tnid] => 0 [translate] => 0 [revision_timestamp] => 1558449480 [revision_uid] => 118 [body] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

Mollie Simon manages the center's social media accounts, drafts newsletters and announcements, writes and publishes content for our website, and regularly posts to our blog. Prior to joining the Kleinman Center, she worked in environmental advocacy at both national and local non-profit organizations. She served as a climate and energy fellow at the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C. and the outreach coordinator at Clean Air Council in Philadelphia. Her policy work has primarily focused on Clean Power Plan implementation and regulation of methane emissions from the natural gas sector. 

Simon holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania, with a concentration in policy.

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

Mollie Simon manages the center's social media accounts, drafts newsletters and announcements, writes and publishes content for our website, and regularly posts to our blog. Prior to joining the Kleinman Center, she worked in environmental advocacy at both national and local non-profit organizations. She served as a climate and energy fellow at the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C. and the outreach coordinator at Clean Air Council in Philadelphia. Her policy work has primarily focused on Clean Power Plan implementation and regulation of methane emissions from the natural gas sector. 

Simon holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania, with a concentration in policy.

[safe_summary] => ) ) ) [field_headshot] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 2535 [uid] => 90 [filename] => UPENN-0356.jpg [uri] => public://UPENN-0356.jpg [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 10996445 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1520859348 [focus_rect] => 0,1159,3648,3648 [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => [title] => [width] => 3648 [height] => 5472 ) ) ) [field_org_title] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Communications Coordinator [format] => [safe_value] => Communications Coordinator ) ) ) [field_email] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [email] => smollie@upenn.edu ) ) ) [field_phone_number] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 215-573-3286 [format] => [safe_value] => 215-573-3286 ) ) ) [field_people_designation] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => staff ) ) ) [field_adboard_organization] => Array ( ) [field_project_years] => Array ( ) [field_bio_type] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [tid] => 185 ) ) ) [field_omit] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0 ) ) ) [field_biodepartment] => Array ( ) [field_teaser] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

is the communications coordinator at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania.

[format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

is the communications coordinator at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania.

) ) ) [field_label_above_name] => Array ( ) [field_year] => Array ( ) [metatags] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [article:published_time] => Array ( [value] => ) [article:modified_time] => Array ( [value] => ) ) ) [rdf_mapping] => Array ( [rdftype] => Array ( [0] => sioc:Item [1] => foaf:Document ) [title] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:title ) ) [created] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:date [1] => dc:created ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [changed] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:modified ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [body] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => content:encoded ) ) [uid] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:has_creator ) [type] => rel ) [name] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => foaf:name ) ) [comment_count] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:num_replies ) [datatype] => xsd:integer ) [last_activity] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:last_activity_date ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) ) [path] => Array ( [pathauto] => 1 ) [name] => bill [picture] => 0 [data] => b:0; ) [access] => 1 ) ) ) [field_addthis] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Dummy value ) ) ) [field_teaser] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. How do these bills compare and will any of them become law?

[format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. How do these bills compare and will any of them become law?

) ) ) [field_primary_theme] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [tid] => 204 ) ) ) [field_secondary_themes] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [tid] => 195 ) ) ) [field_exclude] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0 ) ) ) [field_more_like_this] => Array ( ) [field_show_cropped_image] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1 ) ) ) [field_voices] => Array ( ) [rdf_mapping] => Array ( [rdftype] => Array ( [0] => sioc:Item [1] => foaf:Document ) [title] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:title ) ) [created] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:date [1] => dc:created ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [changed] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:modified ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [body] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => content:encoded ) ) [uid] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:has_creator ) [type] => rel ) [name] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => foaf:name ) ) [comment_count] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:num_replies ) [datatype] => xsd:integer ) [last_activity] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:last_activity_date ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) ) [path] => Array ( [pathauto] => 1 ) [name] => mollie [picture] => 0 [data] => b:0; [entity_view_prepared] => 1 ) [#items] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 3456 [uid] => 118 [filename] => iStock-1059774710.jpg [uri] => public://iStock-1059774710.jpg [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 2450737 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1565634121 [focus_rect] => 0,283,2389,928 [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => The flag outside the U.S. Capitol [title] => [width] => 2400 [height] => 1602 ) ) [#formatter] => image [0] => Array ( [#theme] => image_formatter [#item] => Array ( [fid] => 3456 [uid] => 118 [filename] => iStock-1059774710.jpg [uri] => public://iStock-1059774710.jpg [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 2450737 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1565634121 [focus_rect] => 0,283,2389,928 [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => The flag outside the U.S. Capitol [title] => [width] => 2400 [height] => 1602 ) [#image_style] => new_hero [#path] => ) [#printed] => 1 [#children] =>
The flag outside the U.S. Capitol
) [body] => Array ( [#theme] => field [#weight] => 3 [#title] => Body [#access] => 1 [#label_display] => hidden [#view_mode] => full [#language] => und [#field_name] => body [#field_type] => text_with_summary [#field_translatable] => 0 [#entity_type] => node [#bundle] => wp_blog [#object] => stdClass Object ( [vid] => 13080 [uid] => 118 [title] => Teeming with Carbon Taxes [log] => [status] => 1 [comment] => 0 [promote] => 0 [sticky] => 0 [nid] => 9981 [type] => wp_blog [language] => und [created] => 1565634121 [changed] => 1573503438 [tnid] => 0 [translate] => 0 [revision_timestamp] => 1573503438 [revision_uid] => 118 [body] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. Here is a summary of what has been proposed thus far:

Before we dig into the similarities and differences between these plans, what is a carbon tax? Simply put, a carbon tax is a price put on each unit of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. This price creates an incentive for emitters to lower emissions.

Embedded video: https://youtu.be/45wuGMgG1tE                 

All of the proposed bills put a price on carbon across the energy system. Where they differ is primarily in the price path and revenue use. Resources for the Future created a thorough table that explains the details of each proposed bill and compares the bills to one another.
 

Difference in Carbon Price Rates over Time, Resources for the Future

As you can see in the figure from Resources for the Future, some proposals are more ambitious, like Senator Coons bill that raises the price per ton of carbon dioxide to over $200 by 2035. Not surprisingly, Republican Congressman Rooney has the most moderate plan of the bunch.

And the members have different ideas about how the generated funds should be spent. Representative Deutch’s Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act proposes using all the funds for taxable carbon dividends. The other bills include a variety of revenue uses including payroll tax cuts, social security beneficiary payments, energy efficiency research and development, infrastructure spending, and more.

While there are a lot of ideas floating through the halls of Congress, does any one of them have a chance of becoming law? The short answer is no. Congress has been notoriously deadlocked and divided, with a Republican controlled Senate and a Democratic controlled House. When Congress returns from August recess, there will only have a few weeks before we begin to move into an election year. And in an election year, a controversial bill tackling climate change is highly unlikely to see a vote.

Recent research from the Kleinman Center shows that a carbon tax vote is largely ideological. “While the carbon tax has the favor of economists and policy elites, American voters are not yet ready to jump on the bandwagon. Carbon taxes remain a highly ideological and polarizing issue,” writes the authors. Politicians are not expected to fight for an issue that doesn’t have the backing of their constituents.

While it is doubtful that any of the six proposed bills will become law in this Congress, it is exciting that these issues are being discussed and debated. And encouraging that perhaps sometime in the near future the needle will move even closer to a carbon tax becoming a reality.

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. Here is a summary of what has been proposed thus far:

Before we dig into the similarities and differences between these plans, what is a carbon tax? Simply put, a carbon tax is a price put on each unit of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. This price creates an incentive for emitters to lower emissions.

Embedded video: https://youtu.be/45wuGMgG1tE                 

All of the proposed bills put a price on carbon across the energy system. Where they differ is primarily in the price path and revenue use. Resources for the Future created a thorough table that explains the details of each proposed bill and compares the bills to one another.
 

Difference in Carbon Price Rates over Time, Resources for the Future

As you can see in the figure from Resources for the Future, some proposals are more ambitious, like Senator Coons bill that raises the price per ton of carbon dioxide to over $200 by 2035. Not surprisingly, Republican Congressman Rooney has the most moderate plan of the bunch.

And the members have different ideas about how the generated funds should be spent. Representative Deutch’s Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act proposes using all the funds for taxable carbon dividends. The other bills include a variety of revenue uses including payroll tax cuts, social security beneficiary payments, energy efficiency research and development, infrastructure spending, and more.

While there are a lot of ideas floating through the halls of Congress, does any one of them have a chance of becoming law? The short answer is no. Congress has been notoriously deadlocked and divided, with a Republican controlled Senate and a Democratic controlled House. When Congress returns from August recess, there will only have a few weeks before we begin to move into an election year. And in an election year, a controversial bill tackling climate change is highly unlikely to see a vote.

Recent research from the Kleinman Center shows that a carbon tax vote is largely ideological. “While the carbon tax has the favor of economists and policy elites, American voters are not yet ready to jump on the bandwagon. Carbon taxes remain a highly ideological and polarizing issue,” writes the authors. Politicians are not expected to fight for an issue that doesn’t have the backing of their constituents.

While it is doubtful that any of the six proposed bills will become law in this Congress, it is exciting that these issues are being discussed and debated. And encouraging that perhaps sometime in the near future the needle will move even closer to a carbon tax becoming a reality.

[safe_summary] => ) ) ) [taxonomy_wp_blog_tags] => Array ( ) [field_intro_image] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 3456 [uid] => 118 [filename] => iStock-1059774710.jpg [uri] => public://iStock-1059774710.jpg [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 2450737 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1565634121 [focus_rect] => 0,283,2389,928 [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => The flag outside the U.S. Capitol [title] => [width] => 2400 [height] => 1602 ) ) ) [field_blog_author] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Mollie Simon [format] => [safe_value] => Mollie Simon ) ) ) [field_image_caption] => Array ( ) [field_set_as_featured_] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => no ) ) ) [field_authors] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [target_id] => 2377 [entity] => stdClass Object ( [vid] => 2814 [uid] => 10 [title] => Mollie Simon [log] => [status] => 1 [comment] => 1 [promote] => 0 [sticky] => 0 [nid] => 2377 [type] => people_bio [language] => und [created] => 1471467818 [changed] => 1558449480 [tnid] => 0 [translate] => 0 [revision_timestamp] => 1558449480 [revision_uid] => 118 [body] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

Mollie Simon manages the center's social media accounts, drafts newsletters and announcements, writes and publishes content for our website, and regularly posts to our blog. Prior to joining the Kleinman Center, she worked in environmental advocacy at both national and local non-profit organizations. She served as a climate and energy fellow at the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C. and the outreach coordinator at Clean Air Council in Philadelphia. Her policy work has primarily focused on Clean Power Plan implementation and regulation of methane emissions from the natural gas sector. 

Simon holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania, with a concentration in policy.

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

Mollie Simon manages the center's social media accounts, drafts newsletters and announcements, writes and publishes content for our website, and regularly posts to our blog. Prior to joining the Kleinman Center, she worked in environmental advocacy at both national and local non-profit organizations. She served as a climate and energy fellow at the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C. and the outreach coordinator at Clean Air Council in Philadelphia. Her policy work has primarily focused on Clean Power Plan implementation and regulation of methane emissions from the natural gas sector. 

Simon holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania, with a concentration in policy.

[safe_summary] => ) ) ) [field_headshot] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 2535 [uid] => 90 [filename] => UPENN-0356.jpg [uri] => public://UPENN-0356.jpg [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 10996445 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1520859348 [focus_rect] => 0,1159,3648,3648 [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => [title] => [width] => 3648 [height] => 5472 ) ) ) [field_org_title] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Communications Coordinator [format] => [safe_value] => Communications Coordinator ) ) ) [field_email] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [email] => smollie@upenn.edu ) ) ) [field_phone_number] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 215-573-3286 [format] => [safe_value] => 215-573-3286 ) ) ) [field_people_designation] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => staff ) ) ) [field_adboard_organization] => Array ( ) [field_project_years] => Array ( ) [field_bio_type] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [tid] => 185 ) ) ) [field_omit] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0 ) ) ) [field_biodepartment] => Array ( ) [field_teaser] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

is the communications coordinator at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania.

[format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

is the communications coordinator at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy and holds a master's degree in environmental studies from the University of Pennsylvania.

) ) ) [field_label_above_name] => Array ( ) [field_year] => Array ( ) [metatags] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [article:published_time] => Array ( [value] => ) [article:modified_time] => Array ( [value] => ) ) ) [rdf_mapping] => Array ( [rdftype] => Array ( [0] => sioc:Item [1] => foaf:Document ) [title] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:title ) ) [created] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:date [1] => dc:created ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [changed] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:modified ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [body] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => content:encoded ) ) [uid] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:has_creator ) [type] => rel ) [name] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => foaf:name ) ) [comment_count] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:num_replies ) [datatype] => xsd:integer ) [last_activity] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:last_activity_date ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) ) [path] => Array ( [pathauto] => 1 ) [name] => bill [picture] => 0 [data] => b:0; ) [access] => 1 ) ) ) [field_addthis] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Dummy value ) ) ) [field_teaser] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. How do these bills compare and will any of them become law?

[format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. How do these bills compare and will any of them become law?

) ) ) [field_primary_theme] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [tid] => 204 ) ) ) [field_secondary_themes] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [tid] => 195 ) ) ) [field_exclude] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0 ) ) ) [field_more_like_this] => Array ( ) [field_show_cropped_image] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1 ) ) ) [field_voices] => Array ( ) [rdf_mapping] => Array ( [rdftype] => Array ( [0] => sioc:Item [1] => foaf:Document ) [title] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:title ) ) [created] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:date [1] => dc:created ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [changed] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:modified ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [body] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => content:encoded ) ) [uid] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:has_creator ) [type] => rel ) [name] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => foaf:name ) ) [comment_count] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:num_replies ) [datatype] => xsd:integer ) [last_activity] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:last_activity_date ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) ) [path] => Array ( [pathauto] => 1 ) [name] => mollie [picture] => 0 [data] => b:0; [entity_view_prepared] => 1 ) [#items] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. Here is a summary of what has been proposed thus far:

Before we dig into the similarities and differences between these plans, what is a carbon tax? Simply put, a carbon tax is a price put on each unit of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. This price creates an incentive for emitters to lower emissions.

Embedded video: https://youtu.be/45wuGMgG1tE                 

All of the proposed bills put a price on carbon across the energy system. Where they differ is primarily in the price path and revenue use. Resources for the Future created a thorough table that explains the details of each proposed bill and compares the bills to one another.
 

Difference in Carbon Price Rates over Time, Resources for the Future

As you can see in the figure from Resources for the Future, some proposals are more ambitious, like Senator Coons bill that raises the price per ton of carbon dioxide to over $200 by 2035. Not surprisingly, Republican Congressman Rooney has the most moderate plan of the bunch.

And the members have different ideas about how the generated funds should be spent. Representative Deutch’s Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act proposes using all the funds for taxable carbon dividends. The other bills include a variety of revenue uses including payroll tax cuts, social security beneficiary payments, energy efficiency research and development, infrastructure spending, and more.

While there are a lot of ideas floating through the halls of Congress, does any one of them have a chance of becoming law? The short answer is no. Congress has been notoriously deadlocked and divided, with a Republican controlled Senate and a Democratic controlled House. When Congress returns from August recess, there will only have a few weeks before we begin to move into an election year. And in an election year, a controversial bill tackling climate change is highly unlikely to see a vote.

Recent research from the Kleinman Center shows that a carbon tax vote is largely ideological. “While the carbon tax has the favor of economists and policy elites, American voters are not yet ready to jump on the bandwagon. Carbon taxes remain a highly ideological and polarizing issue,” writes the authors. Politicians are not expected to fight for an issue that doesn’t have the backing of their constituents.

While it is doubtful that any of the six proposed bills will become law in this Congress, it is exciting that these issues are being discussed and debated. And encouraging that perhaps sometime in the near future the needle will move even closer to a carbon tax becoming a reality.

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. Here is a summary of what has been proposed thus far:

Before we dig into the similarities and differences between these plans, what is a carbon tax? Simply put, a carbon tax is a price put on each unit of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. This price creates an incentive for emitters to lower emissions.

Embedded video: https://youtu.be/45wuGMgG1tE                 

All of the proposed bills put a price on carbon across the energy system. Where they differ is primarily in the price path and revenue use. Resources for the Future created a thorough table that explains the details of each proposed bill and compares the bills to one another.
 

Difference in Carbon Price Rates over Time, Resources for the Future

As you can see in the figure from Resources for the Future, some proposals are more ambitious, like Senator Coons bill that raises the price per ton of carbon dioxide to over $200 by 2035. Not surprisingly, Republican Congressman Rooney has the most moderate plan of the bunch.

And the members have different ideas about how the generated funds should be spent. Representative Deutch’s Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act proposes using all the funds for taxable carbon dividends. The other bills include a variety of revenue uses including payroll tax cuts, social security beneficiary payments, energy efficiency research and development, infrastructure spending, and more.

While there are a lot of ideas floating through the halls of Congress, does any one of them have a chance of becoming law? The short answer is no. Congress has been notoriously deadlocked and divided, with a Republican controlled Senate and a Democratic controlled House. When Congress returns from August recess, there will only have a few weeks before we begin to move into an election year. And in an election year, a controversial bill tackling climate change is highly unlikely to see a vote.

Recent research from the Kleinman Center shows that a carbon tax vote is largely ideological. “While the carbon tax has the favor of economists and policy elites, American voters are not yet ready to jump on the bandwagon. Carbon taxes remain a highly ideological and polarizing issue,” writes the authors. Politicians are not expected to fight for an issue that doesn’t have the backing of their constituents.

While it is doubtful that any of the six proposed bills will become law in this Congress, it is exciting that these issues are being discussed and debated. And encouraging that perhaps sometime in the near future the needle will move even closer to a carbon tax becoming a reality.

[safe_summary] => ) ) [#formatter] => text_default [0] => Array ( [#markup] =>

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. Here is a summary of what has been proposed thus far:

Before we dig into the similarities and differences between these plans, what is a carbon tax? Simply put, a carbon tax is a price put on each unit of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. This price creates an incentive for emitters to lower emissions.

Embedded video: https://youtu.be/45wuGMgG1tE                 

All of the proposed bills put a price on carbon across the energy system. Where they differ is primarily in the price path and revenue use. Resources for the Future created a thorough table that explains the details of each proposed bill and compares the bills to one another.
 

Difference in Carbon Price Rates over Time, Resources for the Future

As you can see in the figure from Resources for the Future, some proposals are more ambitious, like Senator Coons bill that raises the price per ton of carbon dioxide to over $200 by 2035. Not surprisingly, Republican Congressman Rooney has the most moderate plan of the bunch.

And the members have different ideas about how the generated funds should be spent. Representative Deutch’s Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act proposes using all the funds for taxable carbon dividends. The other bills include a variety of revenue uses including payroll tax cuts, social security beneficiary payments, energy efficiency research and development, infrastructure spending, and more.

While there are a lot of ideas floating through the halls of Congress, does any one of them have a chance of becoming law? The short answer is no. Congress has been notoriously deadlocked and divided, with a Republican controlled Senate and a Democratic controlled House. When Congress returns from August recess, there will only have a few weeks before we begin to move into an election year. And in an election year, a controversial bill tackling climate change is highly unlikely to see a vote.

Recent research from the Kleinman Center shows that a carbon tax vote is largely ideological. “While the carbon tax has the favor of economists and policy elites, American voters are not yet ready to jump on the bandwagon. Carbon taxes remain a highly ideological and polarizing issue,” writes the authors. Politicians are not expected to fight for an issue that doesn’t have the backing of their constituents.

While it is doubtful that any of the six proposed bills will become law in this Congress, it is exciting that these issues are being discussed and debated. And encouraging that perhaps sometime in the near future the needle will move even closer to a carbon tax becoming a reality.

) ) [submitted_by] => Array ( [0] => Array ( ) [#weight] => 12 [#access] => ) )
The flag outside the U.S. Capitol
August 12, 2019

There has been a flurry of carbon tax bills introduced in Congress this term from members on both sides of the aisle. Here is a summary of what has been proposed thus far:

Before we dig into the similarities and differences between these plans, what is a carbon tax? Simply put, a carbon tax is a price put on each unit of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. This price creates an incentive for emitters to lower emissions.

Embedded video: https://youtu.be/45wuGMgG1tE                 

All of the proposed bills put a price on carbon across the energy system. Where they differ is primarily in the price path and revenue use. Resources for the Future created a thorough table that explains the details of each proposed bill and compares the bills to one another.
 

Difference in Carbon Price Rates over Time, Resources for the Future

As you can see in the figure from Resources for the Future, some proposals are more ambitious, like Senator Coons bill that raises the price per ton of carbon dioxide to over $200 by 2035. Not surprisingly, Republican Congressman Rooney has the most moderate plan of the bunch.

And the members have different ideas about how the generated funds should be spent. Representative Deutch’s Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act proposes using all the funds for taxable carbon dividends. The other bills include a variety of revenue uses including payroll tax cuts, social security beneficiary payments, energy efficiency research and development, infrastructure spending, and more.

While there are a lot of ideas floating through the halls of Congress, does any one of them have a chance of becoming law? The short answer is no. Congress has been notoriously deadlocked and divided, with a Republican controlled Senate and a Democratic controlled House. When Congress returns from August recess, there will only have a few weeks before we begin to move into an election year. And in an election year, a controversial bill tackling climate change is highly unlikely to see a vote.

Recent research from the Kleinman Center shows that a carbon tax vote is largely ideological. “While the carbon tax has the favor of economists and policy elites, American voters are not yet ready to jump on the bandwagon. Carbon taxes remain a highly ideological and polarizing issue,” writes the authors. Politicians are not expected to fight for an issue that doesn’t have the backing of their constituents.

While it is doubtful that any of the six proposed bills will become law in this Congress, it is exciting that these issues are being discussed and debated. And encouraging that perhaps sometime in the near future the needle will move even closer to a carbon tax becoming a reality.

Our blog highlights the research, opinions, and insights of individual authors. It does not represent the voice of the Kleinman Center.

More Like This

Blog Post | November 5, 2019 The Partisan Threat to U.S. Energy Regulation
Policy Digest | February 21, 2019 Targeting Net Zero Emissions