Leaving Paris, and Sanity: A Bad Deal for America and Future Generations

Array
(
    [comments] => Array
        (
        )

    [links] => Array
        (
            [#theme] => links__node
            [#pre_render] => Array
                (
                    [0] => drupal_pre_render_links
                )

            [#attributes] => Array
                (
                    [class] => Array
                        (
                            [0] => links
                            [1] => inline
                        )

                )

            [node] => Array
                (
                    [#theme] => links__node__node
                    [#links] => Array
                        (
                        )

                    [#attributes] => Array
                        (
                            [class] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => links
                                    [1] => inline
                                )

                        )

                )

            [comment] => Array
                (
                    [#theme] => links__node__comment
                    [#links] => Array
                        (
                        )

                    [#attributes] => Array
                        (
                            [class] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => links
                                    [1] => inline
                                )

                        )

                )

        )

    [field_blog_author] => Array
        (
            [#theme] => field
            [#weight] => 0
            [#title] => Blog Author
            [#access] => 1
            [#label_display] => hidden
            [#view_mode] => full
            [#language] => und
            [#field_name] => field_blog_author
            [#field_type] => text
            [#field_translatable] => 0
            [#entity_type] => node
            [#bundle] => wp_blog
            [#object] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [vid] => 4628
                    [uid] => 90
                    [title] => Leaving Paris, and Sanity: A Bad Deal for America and Future Generations
                    [log] => 
                    [status] => 1
                    [comment] => 1
                    [promote] => 0
                    [sticky] => 0
                    [nid] => 3598
                    [type] => wp_blog
                    [language] => und
                    [created] => 1496387933
                    [changed] => 1496761536
                    [tnid] => 0
                    [translate] => 0
                    [revision_timestamp] => 1496761536
                    [revision_uid] => 118
                    [body] => Array
                        (
                            [und] => Array
                                (
                                    [0] => Array
                                        (
                                            [value] => 

President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, despite (to spite?), pretty much, the rest of the world.

But none of that matters to President Trump.

Trump has already taken steps to kill the Clean Power Plan, roll back auto efficiency standards, and most recently—and egregiously, from a climate perspectivestayed EPA’s methane standards for oil and gas development.

Now, in another victory for anti-science, fact-free policymaking and his peculiar, self-destructive idea of nationalism, Trump has chosen to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and renege on the United States’ voluntary pledge to reduce its climate-harming emissions and to support decarbonization in less developed countries, calling it “a bad deal for Americans.” While Trump can’t actually legally withdraw from the Agreement until November, 2020, according to Article 28, he can ignore the commitments the United States made in the agreement. 

Our nation is history’s largest carbon polluter, and was, until recently, the steady and at least somewhat-principled leader of the free world.  This withdrawal by the United States from global leadership and from our responsibility to future generations is morally repugnant, shameful, and un-American.

It puts future generations, and our planet, in peril.

It is also, from an economic standpoint, a profoundly stupid move. The rest of the world—and smart states, cities, businesses, and investors here at home—will take up the immense task of salvaging a habitable climate with, I hope, increased urgency.  China and the European Union in particular will likely reap the economic rewards of climate leadership and clean tech innovation.

But can deep decarbonization be achieved—in time—without the United States in the lead?

Trump’s decision is ignorant and cynical.  It’s an unconscionably bad deal for a habitable climate, for international cooperation, for the reputation of the United States, for our economy, for our children, and for future generations.

 

 

 

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, despite (to spite?), pretty much, the rest of the world.

But none of that matters to President Trump.

Trump has already taken steps to kill the Clean Power Plan, roll back auto efficiency standards, and most recently—and egregiously, from a climate perspectivestayed EPA’s methane standards for oil and gas development.

Now, in another victory for anti-science, fact-free policymaking and his peculiar, self-destructive idea of nationalism, Trump has chosen to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and renege on the United States’ voluntary pledge to reduce its climate-harming emissions and to support decarbonization in less developed countries, calling it “a bad deal for Americans.” While Trump can’t actually legally withdraw from the Agreement until November, 2020, according to Article 28, he can ignore the commitments the United States made in the agreement. 

Our nation is history’s largest carbon polluter, and was, until recently, the steady and at least somewhat-principled leader of the free world.  This withdrawal by the United States from global leadership and from our responsibility to future generations is morally repugnant, shameful, and un-American.

It puts future generations, and our planet, in peril.

It is also, from an economic standpoint, a profoundly stupid move. The rest of the world—and smart states, cities, businesses, and investors here at home—will take up the immense task of salvaging a habitable climate with, I hope, increased urgency.  China and the European Union in particular will likely reap the economic rewards of climate leadership and clean tech innovation.

But can deep decarbonization be achieved—in time—without the United States in the lead?

Trump’s decision is ignorant and cynical.  It’s an unconscionably bad deal for a habitable climate, for international cooperation, for the reputation of the United States, for our economy, for our children, and for future generations.

 

 

 

[safe_summary] => ) ) ) [taxonomy_wp_blog_tags] => Array ( ) [field_intro_image] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 1886 [uid] => 90 [filename] => No-paris.JPG [uri] => public://No-paris.JPG [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 67921 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1496387933 [focus_rect] => [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => [title] => [width] => 995 [height] => 511 ) ) ) [field_blog_author] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => John Quigley [format] => [safe_value] => John Quigley ) ) ) [field_image_caption] => Array ( ) [field_set_as_featured_] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => yes ) ) ) [rdf_mapping] => Array ( [rdftype] => Array ( [0] => sioc:Item [1] => foaf:Document ) [title] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:title ) ) [created] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:date [1] => dc:created ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [changed] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:modified ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [body] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => content:encoded ) ) [uid] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:has_creator ) [type] => rel ) [name] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => foaf:name ) ) [comment_count] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:num_replies ) [datatype] => xsd:integer ) [last_activity] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:last_activity_date ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) ) [path] => Array ( [pathauto] => 1 ) [cid] => 0 [last_comment_timestamp] => 1496387933 [last_comment_name] => [last_comment_uid] => 90 [comment_count] => 0 [name] => lindsey [picture] => 0 [data] => b:0; [entity_view_prepared] => 1 ) [#items] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => John Quigley [format] => [safe_value] => John Quigley ) ) [#formatter] => text_default [0] => Array ( [#markup] => John Quigley ) ) [field_intro_image] => Array ( [#theme] => field [#weight] => 1 [#title] => Intro Image [#access] => 1 [#label_display] => hidden [#view_mode] => full [#language] => und [#field_name] => field_intro_image [#field_type] => image [#field_translatable] => 0 [#entity_type] => node [#bundle] => wp_blog [#object] => stdClass Object ( [vid] => 4628 [uid] => 90 [title] => Leaving Paris, and Sanity: A Bad Deal for America and Future Generations [log] => [status] => 1 [comment] => 1 [promote] => 0 [sticky] => 0 [nid] => 3598 [type] => wp_blog [language] => und [created] => 1496387933 [changed] => 1496761536 [tnid] => 0 [translate] => 0 [revision_timestamp] => 1496761536 [revision_uid] => 118 [body] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, despite (to spite?), pretty much, the rest of the world.

But none of that matters to President Trump.

Trump has already taken steps to kill the Clean Power Plan, roll back auto efficiency standards, and most recently—and egregiously, from a climate perspectivestayed EPA’s methane standards for oil and gas development.

Now, in another victory for anti-science, fact-free policymaking and his peculiar, self-destructive idea of nationalism, Trump has chosen to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and renege on the United States’ voluntary pledge to reduce its climate-harming emissions and to support decarbonization in less developed countries, calling it “a bad deal for Americans.” While Trump can’t actually legally withdraw from the Agreement until November, 2020, according to Article 28, he can ignore the commitments the United States made in the agreement. 

Our nation is history’s largest carbon polluter, and was, until recently, the steady and at least somewhat-principled leader of the free world.  This withdrawal by the United States from global leadership and from our responsibility to future generations is morally repugnant, shameful, and un-American.

It puts future generations, and our planet, in peril.

It is also, from an economic standpoint, a profoundly stupid move. The rest of the world—and smart states, cities, businesses, and investors here at home—will take up the immense task of salvaging a habitable climate with, I hope, increased urgency.  China and the European Union in particular will likely reap the economic rewards of climate leadership and clean tech innovation.

But can deep decarbonization be achieved—in time—without the United States in the lead?

Trump’s decision is ignorant and cynical.  It’s an unconscionably bad deal for a habitable climate, for international cooperation, for the reputation of the United States, for our economy, for our children, and for future generations.

 

 

 

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, despite (to spite?), pretty much, the rest of the world.

But none of that matters to President Trump.

Trump has already taken steps to kill the Clean Power Plan, roll back auto efficiency standards, and most recently—and egregiously, from a climate perspectivestayed EPA’s methane standards for oil and gas development.

Now, in another victory for anti-science, fact-free policymaking and his peculiar, self-destructive idea of nationalism, Trump has chosen to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and renege on the United States’ voluntary pledge to reduce its climate-harming emissions and to support decarbonization in less developed countries, calling it “a bad deal for Americans.” While Trump can’t actually legally withdraw from the Agreement until November, 2020, according to Article 28, he can ignore the commitments the United States made in the agreement. 

Our nation is history’s largest carbon polluter, and was, until recently, the steady and at least somewhat-principled leader of the free world.  This withdrawal by the United States from global leadership and from our responsibility to future generations is morally repugnant, shameful, and un-American.

It puts future generations, and our planet, in peril.

It is also, from an economic standpoint, a profoundly stupid move. The rest of the world—and smart states, cities, businesses, and investors here at home—will take up the immense task of salvaging a habitable climate with, I hope, increased urgency.  China and the European Union in particular will likely reap the economic rewards of climate leadership and clean tech innovation.

But can deep decarbonization be achieved—in time—without the United States in the lead?

Trump’s decision is ignorant and cynical.  It’s an unconscionably bad deal for a habitable climate, for international cooperation, for the reputation of the United States, for our economy, for our children, and for future generations.

 

 

 

[safe_summary] => ) ) ) [taxonomy_wp_blog_tags] => Array ( ) [field_intro_image] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 1886 [uid] => 90 [filename] => No-paris.JPG [uri] => public://No-paris.JPG [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 67921 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1496387933 [focus_rect] => [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => [title] => [width] => 995 [height] => 511 ) ) ) [field_blog_author] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => John Quigley [format] => [safe_value] => John Quigley ) ) ) [field_image_caption] => Array ( ) [field_set_as_featured_] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => yes ) ) ) [rdf_mapping] => Array ( [rdftype] => Array ( [0] => sioc:Item [1] => foaf:Document ) [title] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:title ) ) [created] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:date [1] => dc:created ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [changed] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:modified ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [body] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => content:encoded ) ) [uid] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:has_creator ) [type] => rel ) [name] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => foaf:name ) ) [comment_count] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:num_replies ) [datatype] => xsd:integer ) [last_activity] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:last_activity_date ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) ) [path] => Array ( [pathauto] => 1 ) [cid] => 0 [last_comment_timestamp] => 1496387933 [last_comment_name] => [last_comment_uid] => 90 [comment_count] => 0 [name] => lindsey [picture] => 0 [data] => b:0; [entity_view_prepared] => 1 ) [#items] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 1886 [uid] => 90 [filename] => No-paris.JPG [uri] => public://No-paris.JPG [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 67921 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1496387933 [focus_rect] => [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => [title] => [width] => 995 [height] => 511 ) ) [#formatter] => image [0] => Array ( [#theme] => image_formatter [#item] => Array ( [fid] => 1886 [uid] => 90 [filename] => No-paris.JPG [uri] => public://No-paris.JPG [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 67921 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1496387933 [focus_rect] => [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => [title] => [width] => 995 [height] => 511 ) [#image_style] => content_width [#path] => ) ) [body] => Array ( [#theme] => field [#weight] => 3 [#title] => Body [#access] => 1 [#label_display] => hidden [#view_mode] => full [#language] => und [#field_name] => body [#field_type] => text_with_summary [#field_translatable] => 0 [#entity_type] => node [#bundle] => wp_blog [#object] => stdClass Object ( [vid] => 4628 [uid] => 90 [title] => Leaving Paris, and Sanity: A Bad Deal for America and Future Generations [log] => [status] => 1 [comment] => 1 [promote] => 0 [sticky] => 0 [nid] => 3598 [type] => wp_blog [language] => und [created] => 1496387933 [changed] => 1496761536 [tnid] => 0 [translate] => 0 [revision_timestamp] => 1496761536 [revision_uid] => 118 [body] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, despite (to spite?), pretty much, the rest of the world.

But none of that matters to President Trump.

Trump has already taken steps to kill the Clean Power Plan, roll back auto efficiency standards, and most recently—and egregiously, from a climate perspectivestayed EPA’s methane standards for oil and gas development.

Now, in another victory for anti-science, fact-free policymaking and his peculiar, self-destructive idea of nationalism, Trump has chosen to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and renege on the United States’ voluntary pledge to reduce its climate-harming emissions and to support decarbonization in less developed countries, calling it “a bad deal for Americans.” While Trump can’t actually legally withdraw from the Agreement until November, 2020, according to Article 28, he can ignore the commitments the United States made in the agreement. 

Our nation is history’s largest carbon polluter, and was, until recently, the steady and at least somewhat-principled leader of the free world.  This withdrawal by the United States from global leadership and from our responsibility to future generations is morally repugnant, shameful, and un-American.

It puts future generations, and our planet, in peril.

It is also, from an economic standpoint, a profoundly stupid move. The rest of the world—and smart states, cities, businesses, and investors here at home—will take up the immense task of salvaging a habitable climate with, I hope, increased urgency.  China and the European Union in particular will likely reap the economic rewards of climate leadership and clean tech innovation.

But can deep decarbonization be achieved—in time—without the United States in the lead?

Trump’s decision is ignorant and cynical.  It’s an unconscionably bad deal for a habitable climate, for international cooperation, for the reputation of the United States, for our economy, for our children, and for future generations.

 

 

 

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, despite (to spite?), pretty much, the rest of the world.

But none of that matters to President Trump.

Trump has already taken steps to kill the Clean Power Plan, roll back auto efficiency standards, and most recently—and egregiously, from a climate perspectivestayed EPA’s methane standards for oil and gas development.

Now, in another victory for anti-science, fact-free policymaking and his peculiar, self-destructive idea of nationalism, Trump has chosen to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and renege on the United States’ voluntary pledge to reduce its climate-harming emissions and to support decarbonization in less developed countries, calling it “a bad deal for Americans.” While Trump can’t actually legally withdraw from the Agreement until November, 2020, according to Article 28, he can ignore the commitments the United States made in the agreement. 

Our nation is history’s largest carbon polluter, and was, until recently, the steady and at least somewhat-principled leader of the free world.  This withdrawal by the United States from global leadership and from our responsibility to future generations is morally repugnant, shameful, and un-American.

It puts future generations, and our planet, in peril.

It is also, from an economic standpoint, a profoundly stupid move. The rest of the world—and smart states, cities, businesses, and investors here at home—will take up the immense task of salvaging a habitable climate with, I hope, increased urgency.  China and the European Union in particular will likely reap the economic rewards of climate leadership and clean tech innovation.

But can deep decarbonization be achieved—in time—without the United States in the lead?

Trump’s decision is ignorant and cynical.  It’s an unconscionably bad deal for a habitable climate, for international cooperation, for the reputation of the United States, for our economy, for our children, and for future generations.

 

 

 

[safe_summary] => ) ) ) [taxonomy_wp_blog_tags] => Array ( ) [field_intro_image] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [fid] => 1886 [uid] => 90 [filename] => No-paris.JPG [uri] => public://No-paris.JPG [filemime] => image/jpeg [filesize] => 67921 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 1496387933 [focus_rect] => [crop_rect] => [rdf_mapping] => Array ( ) [alt] => [title] => [width] => 995 [height] => 511 ) ) ) [field_blog_author] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => John Quigley [format] => [safe_value] => John Quigley ) ) ) [field_image_caption] => Array ( ) [field_set_as_featured_] => Array ( [und] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => yes ) ) ) [rdf_mapping] => Array ( [rdftype] => Array ( [0] => sioc:Item [1] => foaf:Document ) [title] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:title ) ) [created] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:date [1] => dc:created ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [changed] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:modified ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [body] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => content:encoded ) ) [uid] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:has_creator ) [type] => rel ) [name] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => foaf:name ) ) [comment_count] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:num_replies ) [datatype] => xsd:integer ) [last_activity] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:last_activity_date ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) ) [path] => Array ( [pathauto] => 1 ) [cid] => 0 [last_comment_timestamp] => 1496387933 [last_comment_name] => [last_comment_uid] => 90 [comment_count] => 0 [name] => lindsey [picture] => 0 [data] => b:0; [entity_view_prepared] => 1 ) [#items] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] =>

President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, despite (to spite?), pretty much, the rest of the world.

But none of that matters to President Trump.

Trump has already taken steps to kill the Clean Power Plan, roll back auto efficiency standards, and most recently—and egregiously, from a climate perspectivestayed EPA’s methane standards for oil and gas development.

Now, in another victory for anti-science, fact-free policymaking and his peculiar, self-destructive idea of nationalism, Trump has chosen to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and renege on the United States’ voluntary pledge to reduce its climate-harming emissions and to support decarbonization in less developed countries, calling it “a bad deal for Americans.” While Trump can’t actually legally withdraw from the Agreement until November, 2020, according to Article 28, he can ignore the commitments the United States made in the agreement. 

Our nation is history’s largest carbon polluter, and was, until recently, the steady and at least somewhat-principled leader of the free world.  This withdrawal by the United States from global leadership and from our responsibility to future generations is morally repugnant, shameful, and un-American.

It puts future generations, and our planet, in peril.

It is also, from an economic standpoint, a profoundly stupid move. The rest of the world—and smart states, cities, businesses, and investors here at home—will take up the immense task of salvaging a habitable climate with, I hope, increased urgency.  China and the European Union in particular will likely reap the economic rewards of climate leadership and clean tech innovation.

But can deep decarbonization be achieved—in time—without the United States in the lead?

Trump’s decision is ignorant and cynical.  It’s an unconscionably bad deal for a habitable climate, for international cooperation, for the reputation of the United States, for our economy, for our children, and for future generations.

 

 

 

[summary] => [format] => full_html [safe_value] =>

President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, despite (to spite?), pretty much, the rest of the world.

But none of that matters to President Trump.

Trump has already taken steps to kill the Clean Power Plan, roll back auto efficiency standards, and most recently—and egregiously, from a climate perspectivestayed EPA’s methane standards for oil and gas development.

Now, in another victory for anti-science, fact-free policymaking and his peculiar, self-destructive idea of nationalism, Trump has chosen to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and renege on the United States’ voluntary pledge to reduce its climate-harming emissions and to support decarbonization in less developed countries, calling it “a bad deal for Americans.” While Trump can’t actually legally withdraw from the Agreement until November, 2020, according to Article 28, he can ignore the commitments the United States made in the agreement. 

Our nation is history’s largest carbon polluter, and was, until recently, the steady and at least somewhat-principled leader of the free world.  This withdrawal by the United States from global leadership and from our responsibility to future generations is morally repugnant, shameful, and un-American.

It puts future generations, and our planet, in peril.

It is also, from an economic standpoint, a profoundly stupid move. The rest of the world—and smart states, cities, businesses, and investors here at home—will take up the immense task of salvaging a habitable climate with, I hope, increased urgency.  China and the European Union in particular will likely reap the economic rewards of climate leadership and clean tech innovation.

But can deep decarbonization be achieved—in time—without the United States in the lead?

Trump’s decision is ignorant and cynical.  It’s an unconscionably bad deal for a habitable climate, for international cooperation, for the reputation of the United States, for our economy, for our children, and for future generations.

 

 

 

[safe_summary] => ) ) [#formatter] => text_default [0] => Array ( [#markup] =>

President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, despite (to spite?), pretty much, the rest of the world.

But none of that matters to President Trump.

Trump has already taken steps to kill the Clean Power Plan, roll back auto efficiency standards, and most recently—and egregiously, from a climate perspectivestayed EPA’s methane standards for oil and gas development.

Now, in another victory for anti-science, fact-free policymaking and his peculiar, self-destructive idea of nationalism, Trump has chosen to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and renege on the United States’ voluntary pledge to reduce its climate-harming emissions and to support decarbonization in less developed countries, calling it “a bad deal for Americans.” While Trump can’t actually legally withdraw from the Agreement until November, 2020, according to Article 28, he can ignore the commitments the United States made in the agreement. 

Our nation is history’s largest carbon polluter, and was, until recently, the steady and at least somewhat-principled leader of the free world.  This withdrawal by the United States from global leadership and from our responsibility to future generations is morally repugnant, shameful, and un-American.

It puts future generations, and our planet, in peril.

It is also, from an economic standpoint, a profoundly stupid move. The rest of the world—and smart states, cities, businesses, and investors here at home—will take up the immense task of salvaging a habitable climate with, I hope, increased urgency.  China and the European Union in particular will likely reap the economic rewards of climate leadership and clean tech innovation.

But can deep decarbonization be achieved—in time—without the United States in the lead?

Trump’s decision is ignorant and cynical.  It’s an unconscionably bad deal for a habitable climate, for international cooperation, for the reputation of the United States, for our economy, for our children, and for future generations.

 

 

 

) ) [submitted_by] => Array ( [0] => Array ( ) [#weight] => 5 [#access] => ) )
Posted by
John Quigley
on June 2, 2017

President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, despite (to spite?), pretty much, the rest of the world.

But none of that matters to President Trump.

Trump has already taken steps to kill the Clean Power Plan, roll back auto efficiency standards, and most recently—and egregiously, from a climate perspectivestayed EPA’s methane standards for oil and gas development.

Now, in another victory for anti-science, fact-free policymaking and his peculiar, self-destructive idea of nationalism, Trump has chosen to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and renege on the United States’ voluntary pledge to reduce its climate-harming emissions and to support decarbonization in less developed countries, calling it “a bad deal for Americans.” While Trump can’t actually legally withdraw from the Agreement until November, 2020, according to Article 28, he can ignore the commitments the United States made in the agreement. 

Our nation is history’s largest carbon polluter, and was, until recently, the steady and at least somewhat-principled leader of the free world.  This withdrawal by the United States from global leadership and from our responsibility to future generations is morally repugnant, shameful, and un-American.

It puts future generations, and our planet, in peril.

It is also, from an economic standpoint, a profoundly stupid move. The rest of the world—and smart states, cities, businesses, and investors here at home—will take up the immense task of salvaging a habitable climate with, I hope, increased urgency.  China and the European Union in particular will likely reap the economic rewards of climate leadership and clean tech innovation.

But can deep decarbonization be achieved—in time—without the United States in the lead?

Trump’s decision is ignorant and cynical.  It’s an unconscionably bad deal for a habitable climate, for international cooperation, for the reputation of the United States, for our economy, for our children, and for future generations.